Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Zhao's avatar

I guess this is somewhat expected given the prompt and the people interviewed, but I'm nonetheless surprised that no one mentioned literally holy structures. I've experienced strong feelings while inside of (or outside of) constructed secular spaces like the ones mentioned, but none come close to the depth of feeling evoked by my sunrise visit to Angkor Wat in 2013, which was like touching the other side in a way that I've only otherwise experienced through deep meditation or on psychedelics. (I'd include the Sistine Chapel in the same category but that had more to do with the painting than the architecture itself.)

Caroline Steranka's avatar

The Pantheon was the building for me. I loved this article so much. I often find myself looking back in time for inspiration as an architect. There is something about that era of building that feels deeply intentional and enduring.

I long for architecture to return to that sense of transcendent beauty. Buildings with presence. With permanence. With material honesty and proportion that feels almost sacred. Spaces shaped by light and gravity rather than by trends.

The Pantheon reminds me that architecture can move you through restraint alone. Geometry, structure, and light working together in quiet conviction. I hope we find our way back to creating buildings that are designed to last, both physically and emotionally.

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?